Mercury 3 ships a working diffusion model, but an outside benchmark says it loses to Haiku 5.5

Mercury 3 ships a working diffusion model, but an outside benchmark says it loses to Haiku 5.5

Good morning πŸ‘‹ A diffusion model finally shipped with real pricing and a million-token window. Inception's own benchmark says it beats Claude Haiku 5.5. An independent one says it doesn't.

In today's issue:

Get tomorrow's issue in your inbox.

One concise AI brief, sent after the signal clears the noise.


πŸ”­ THE ONE THING

πŸŒ€ Mercury 3 ships a working diffusion model, but an outside benchmark says it loses to Haiku 5.5

Inception Labs shipped Mercury 3 yesterday: a diffusion-based LLM, non-autoregressive, with a 1M-token context window (up from 260K in Mercury 2.5) and pricing at $0.20/$0.70 per million tokens ($0.10/$0.35 at launch, 90% off cached input), live on the Inception API, OpenRouter, Baseten, and Vercel. Inception's own numbers say it's 40x bigger than Mercury 1 and beats Claude Haiku 5.5; Bito.ai's independent benchmark says otherwise, scoring Mercury 3 at 76% on one-shot coding against Haiku's 79%, and 65% on long agent sessions against 87% for Opus 5.5 and 77% for Sonnet 5.5. The vendor's claimed 1,068 tokens per second hasn't been checked by anyone outside Inception either. A diffusion model that actually ships, with real pricing and a real context window, is worth watching regardless. But on the one number that matters for deciding what to call in production, trust the outside test over the vendor's own scoreboard.


🧠 MODELS & RELEASES


πŸ”¬ RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS


πŸ›οΈ POLICY & REGULATION


πŸ”— QUICK LINKS


Trust the test you can actually check.

Pradeep Perugu

Get inovAIte in your inbox.