Sakana Marlin adds a chat layer and a PowerPoint button to AI research reports

Sakana Marlin adds a chat layer and a PowerPoint button to AI research reports

Good morning ๐Ÿ‘‹ Sakana didn't touch Marlin's model today. It just made the report argue back, then land in a deck your VP will actually open.

In today's issue:

Get tomorrow's issue in your inbox.

One concise AI brief, sent after the signal clears the noise.


๐Ÿ”ญ THE ONE THING

๐Ÿ” Sakana Marlin adds a chat layer and a PowerPoint button to AI research reports

Sakana AI shipped two updates to Marlin, its AB-MCTS-powered research agent: Interactive Reading, which lets you question a report's claims in chat and jumps straight to the cited passage instead of making you hunt for it, and a PowerPoint export that keeps every slide's source URL intact while you edit text and tables. Neither is a new model or a new capability so much as friction removal: the complaint Sakana says it heard was people spending more time parsing the report than trusting it. That's a real problem for anyone who's tried to get a research agent's output past a skeptical VP, and shipping the citation trail straight into a deck is the more useful fix of the two. Small update, no big claims attached, worth a look if you already run Marlin for diligence work; not worth switching to it for.


๐Ÿง  MODELS & RELEASES


๐Ÿ”ฌ RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS


๐Ÿ› ๏ธ TRY THIS

Turn a Marlin report into a deck you can still edit

1. Point Marlin at the doc or dataset you want summarized, then use the new Interactive Reading mode to push back on its own output before you trust it.

2. Ask it to defend the weakest claim in the report, not recap the strongest one. That's where a summarizer usually cuts corners.

3. Export the result straight to PowerPoint now that Marlin ships that format natively.

4. Drop the .pptx into genoffice and let your coding agent fix a broken chart or reflow a slide locally, no PowerPoint license required.

Prompt: Read this report and argue against its own top three conclusions. For each, give the strongest counter-evidence and say whether it changes what I should do.

Worth a look


๐Ÿ”— QUICK LINKS


That's the signal today.

Pradeep Perugu

Get inovAIte in your inbox.