25 Fields Medalists tell AI labs to stop treating math like a benchmark

25 Fields Medalists tell AI labs to stop treating math like a benchmark

Good morning ๐Ÿ‘‹ Twenty-five Fields Medalists just told AI labs, in one voice, to knock it off. When mathematicians who can't agree on lunch sign the same letter, that's the story.

In today's issue:

Get tomorrow's issue in your inbox.

One concise AI brief, sent after the signal clears the noise.


๐Ÿ”ญ THE ONE THING

๐Ÿงฎ 25 Fields Medalists tell AI labs to stop treating math like a benchmark

Twenty-five Fields Medalists, spanning Pierre Deligne's 1978 medal to Yu Deng's this year, signed a declaration posted yesterday on Terence Tao's blog, arguing that labs racing to solve famous open problems as benchmarks are publishing "in a rush, leaving no time for a proper writeup, the isolation of new methods and ideas, and citing relevant previous work." They admit outright they skipped the usual consultative drafting process because the moment felt too urgent to wait. Getting 25 Fields Medalists to agree on where to get lunch is hard, so a unanimous statement like this is itself the signal. Their complaint is about incentives: a lab chasing a "solved it" headline has no reason to wait for peer review, and a proof nobody can check or build on is a trophy, not math. Mathematicians rarely move this fast as a bloc. If benchmark culture keeps rewarding "solved" over "understood," this won't be the last group to push back.


๐Ÿ›๏ธ POLICY & REGULATION


๐Ÿ”— QUICK LINKS


See you tomorrow.

Pradeep Perugu

Get inovAIte in your inbox.